Researchers say the federal home health benefit tries to serve several aims at once, blurring whether it cuts costs, supports recovery, or helps frail adults.
The analysis outlined three possible goals: substitute for institutional post-acute care, cover treatment at home after acute events, or provide ongoing long-term support.
It noted community-based episodes, started without a prior hospital stay, looked more like ongoing supportive care than short-term recovery from an acute medical event.
Possible reforms include cost sharing if services are treated like standard medical care, or tighter eligibility alignment if the goal is limiting institutional use.
If long-term care is the priority, fixed-budget cash-for-care could merit consideration, and researchers stressed every reform choice depends on clearly defining the benefit's purpose.
Questions about care at home?

Leave a Reply